(That presents interesting possibilities!)Īccording to Microsoft (), the Arial Unicode MS font "contains glyphs for all code points within the Unicode Standard, version 2.1." I couldn't find any music characters, sad to say. It may be woefully inadequate for actual music engraving, but is apparently useful for something like a web page. If anyone is interested, the Unicode chart for musical symbols can be found at. Post Edited (Michael Good) : 4:02:01 PM (GMT-6) But they may work if your musical examples are sufficiently straightforward. Unicode Western musical symbols are incomplete, so they tend not to be used even for their intended purpose of inline text. Have I seen your name on an OU forum.? But I've said too much.įinale 2009c, 2Ghz iMac 2Ghz MacBook, 10.6.1Įdirol FA-66 M-Audio Oxygen 61 Yamaha PSR-410 If you do indeed need the a text font that includes musical characters in those glyph positions, then you may have to use a font editor to graft the symbols from your old font into the 1D00 - 1D1FF range of your Unicode text font. So, for example, I can use Type 1 fonts in a text document, and that text can be encoded as UTF-8, UTF-16, Windows, Mac OS Roman, ISO 2022 Japanese, or any other type of Unicode encoding. Why does the FONT need to be Unicode? I would have thought that the app and the OS would handle the encoding, and the font would be irrelevant. You may find a complete Unicode font that includes them, but I'd be surprised.
Neither seems to use the Unicode music positions. As far as I know, music fonts are divided into those used for notation, and those used for inserting music symbols into body text. I had a discussion about Unicode musical characters on another forum.
0 kommentar(er)
